Garfield Heights Family Rentals & Golf course

Find Family-Friendly Vacation Rentals Near Garfield Heights

About Garfield Heights Family Rental on StayAndPlay

Discover 74 in Garfield Heights, perfect for reunions and group retreats.

StayAndPlay offers a variety of spacious and luxurious golf resorts, private villas, and vacation rentals designed to host large families or groups. Whether you’re planning a reunion with kids, grandparents, or even pets, our Garfield Heights rentals offer an unforgettable experience near world-class golf courses.

Many of our accommodations feature modern amenities such as outdoor patios, fully equipped kitchens, Wi-Fi, and private pools, ensuring comfort and convenience for your entire group. Explore 74 with ample space to make your family retreat truly special.

Book with StayAndPlay today and reconnect with loved ones in a luxurious and scenic golf getaway.

Show more
Show less

Frequently Asked Questions About Garfield Heights Family Rentals

There are a lot of options in Garfield Heights. If you plan on staying in the Garfield Heights area, consider making a reservation for a few nights at one of these properties as these have been rated the top Family Rentals in Garfield Heights:

The average price per night for a family holiday rental in Garfield Heights is $149. Check the list of kid-friendly accommodations in Garfield Heights.
There are 74 2-bedroom rental properties that are available in Garfield Heights. You can book for your next trip with StayAndPlay.
Yes, here are some top-rated family vacation rentals in Garfield Heights that have a private swimming pool:

Check all holiday rentals with a pool in Garfield Heights on StayAndPlay.

Yes, We have 74 direct by owner rentals in Garfield Heights.
Yes, Of course! There are many luxury rental properties in or near Garfield Heights. Use our search filter to discover all of our luxury homes with your favorite amenities. Sorting by price is another way to find the luxury holiday rentals in Garfield Heights, though more expensive is not always better.